Add on GoogleCalculate

Mifflin-St Jeor Calculator (Basal Metabolic Rate)

Calculate your estimated Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR) with the landmark 1990 Mifflin–St Jeor equations. Step-by-step mathematical breakdown, formula comparison, and transparent energy modeling.

📅 1990 AJCN•👥 498 Subjects•🔬 Indirect Calorimetry

Your Personal Details

Enter your metrics to compute your basal metabolic rate

Default values
years
lbs
Height
ft
in
🔬Mifflin–St Jeor (1990) · BMR
AJCN 1990 · PMID: 2305711
Estimated Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR)
1,697kcal/day

Your estimated daily resting baseline metabolism before physical activity or exercise

Per Hour (Avg)
≈ 70.7 kcal
Per Minute
≈ 1.18 kcal
SI Metric (kJ)
≈ 7,099 kJ
ℹ️Formula Context & Meaning

Your estimated BMR represents the predicted 24-hour energy your body expends at rest to sustain fundamental physiological functions. This mathematical prediction has an expected individual variance of ~10–14% and does not include intentional exercise, physical activity, or digestion.

🎯

Realistic Metabolic Variance Band (±10%)

Expected physiological range for individual metabolic differences

±10% Buffer
1,527 kcal (−10%)
1,697 kcal (Expected)
1,867 kcal (+10%)
Lower Bound (−10%)1,527 kcal
Expected BMR1,697 kcal
Upper Bound (+10%)1,867 kcal
💡 Why is there a range?

Predictive formulas represent statistical averages. Real human basal metabolisms naturally fluctuate by ~10% due to internal organ proportions (liver, brain, heart), autonomic tone, and thyroid setpoints. Use this range to avoid unnecessary restriction if weight changes stall.

🚀

Calorie & Macro Target Starter

Actionable daily nutrition targets derived from your metabolic baseline

Recommended Daily Intake for Fat Loss:

Designed for an evidence-informed deficit (~0.5–1 lb/wk weight loss rate)

1,536kcal/day
Evidence-Informed Starter Macronutrients:
🥩 Protein (~1.8g/kg)135g540 kcal
🥑 Fats (25%)43g384 kcal
🍚 Carbohydrates153g612 kcal
⚖️ Calibrate against your 14-day weigh-in trend.Open Full TDEE Calculator→
Next Step: Total Daily EnergyTDEE.page

Your resting energy expenditure is only one part of your daily metabolism. Ready to calculate your total daily burn and explore custom deficit or surplus targets?

Calculate Total Daily Energy Expenditure (TDEE) →

What Is the Mifflin–St Jeor Equation?

The Mifflin–St Jeor Equation is one of the most widely referenced and validated mathematical formulas in modern human energetics. Published in 1990 by Mark D. Mifflin, Sachiko T. St Jeor, and their research team at the University of Nevada School of Medicine in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, the equation predicts an individual's Resting Energy Expenditure (REE) based on body weight, stature (height), age, and biological sex.

Unlike historical equations from the early 20th century that evaluated small, specialized cohorts, Mifflin and colleagues developed their model from a diverse dataset of 498 healthy adult participants (251 males, 247 females) aged 19 to 78 years, with resting energy expenditure measured using indirect calorimetry.

Original Research BenchmarkAm J Clin Nutr · 1990; 51(2): 241–247

A new predictive equation for resting energy expenditure in healthy individuals

Mifflin MD, St Jeor ST, Hill LA, Scott BJ, Daugherty SA, Koh YO. (1990)

Cohort Size498 Subjects
Age Range19–78 Years
MeasurementIndirect Calorimetry

The Mifflin–St Jeor Equations (1990)

Standard linear regression & Fat-Free Mass models published in AJCN

Standard Equation for Men:
BMR (kcal/day) = (10 × W) + (6.25 × H) − (5 × A) + 5
W = Weight (kg)

Contributes exactly +10 kcal/day per kilogram of total body mass.

H = Height (cm)

Contributes exactly +6.25 kcal/day per centimeter of stature.

A = Age (years)

Reduces −5.0 kcal/day for every year of age to reflect metabolic shifts.

The Energy Architecture: From Metrics to REE & TDEE

How your individual physiological characteristics translate into daily resting and total expenditure

Biometrics⚖️ Body Weight📏 Body Height🎂 Chronological Age⚧ Biological SexMifflin–St Jeor Engine+10 × Weight (kg)+6.25 × Height (cm)−5 × Age (years)+5 (Men) / −161 (Women)Estimated BMR(Basal Metabolism)~60–75%of daily expenditure× PALTotal TDEEDaily Total100%24-hour burn

How to Calculate Mifflin–St Jeor Manually: Step-by-Step

To illustrate the exact arithmetic performed by our calculation engine, consider a 30-year-old male weighing 75 kg (165 lbs) with a height of 175 cm (5 ft 9 in):

Step 1: Write the Male Formula

REE = (10 × Weight) + (6.25 × Height) − (5 × Age) + 5

Step 2: Substitute Personal Values

REE = (10 × 75) + (6.25 × 175) − (5 × 30) + 5

Step 3: Compute Individual Contributions
  • • Weight contribution: 10 × 75 = +750.0 kcal
  • • Height contribution: 6.25 × 175 = +1,093.75 kcal
  • • Age adjustment: −5 × 30 = −150.0 kcal
  • • Sex constant: +5.0 kcal
Step 4: Sum All Terms

REE = 750 + 1,093.75 − 150 + 5 = 1,698.75 ≈ 1,699 kcal/day

REE vs. BMR vs. TDEE: Understanding Physiological Boundaries

In fitness media and nutrition forums, REE, BMR, and TDEE are frequently conflated. However, each metric describes a distinct physiological condition:

Metabolic QuantityFull TermTesting & Fasting ConditionsShare of Total Daily Energy
REE (Mifflin–St Jeor)Resting Energy ExpenditureResting seated/supine, thermo-neutral room, 4–5h post-meal. Typically 3–10% higher than strict BMR.~60–75% of TDEE
BMR (Harris–Benedict)Basal Metabolic RateStrict 12h overnight fast, measured immediately upon waking in thermo-neutral stillness.~60–70% of TDEE
TDEETotal Daily Energy ExpenditureFull 24h expenditure: Resting Rate + Exercise + Non-Exercise Movement (NEAT) + Thermic Effect of Food (TEF).100% of Daily Output

How Accurate Is the Mifflin–St Jeor Equation?

While many fitness calculators market Mifflin–St Jeor as “the single most accurate formula,” nutritional science demonstrates that all predictive equations carry inherent statistical error:

📊 Statistical Accuracy in General Adults

In systematic reviews (such as Frankenfield et al., 2005), the Mifflin–St Jeor equation estimated resting energy expenditure within ±10% of measured indirect calorimetry in approximately 70–80% of non-obese and obese healthy adults.

🏋️ Athletic & Muscular Populations

Because Mifflin–St Jeor relies solely on total body mass rather than body composition, it may underestimate resting metabolism in highly muscular athletes. For individuals with known lean body mass, body-composition formulas (like Katch–McArdle) often provide closer alignment.

⚠️ Responsible Interpretation Notice:

Your calculated REE is an educational statistical approximation, not a direct laboratory measurement. True individual metabolism varies based on organ mass, daily non-exercise physical activity, and historical nutritional intake.

Mifflin–St Jeor vs. Harris–Benedict: What's the Difference?

When comparing Mifflin–St Jeor with the Harris–Benedict Calculator, users often notice a 20–60 kcal difference in estimated baseline burn:

FeatureMifflin–St Jeor (1990)Harris–Benedict (1919 / 1984)
Original Publication1990 (Am J Clin Nutr)1918/1919 (Carnegie Inst.) & 1984 revision
Primary QuantityResting Energy Expenditure (REE)Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR)
Study Cohort498 modern adults (ages 19–78)239 historical adult subjects
Typical DifferenceTends to estimate 20–60 kcal lowerTends to estimate 20–60 kcal higher

The 1990 Fat-Free Mass (FFM) Equation & The ±10% Variance Band

In the original 1990 AJCN paper, Mifflin and St Jeor tested multiple regression models to identify the strongest biological driver of resting energy expenditure. They discovered that Fat-Free Mass (FFM) was the single best linear predictor ($R^2 = 0.64$):

BMR (kcal/day) = (19.7 × FFM in kg) + 413

While fat tissue expends approximately 4.5 kcal/kg/day, skeletal muscle and vital organs (liver, brain, heart, kidneys) expend between 13 and 200+ kcal/kg/day. By entering your estimated Body Fat %, our calculator unlocks this lean-mass equation, allowing athletic or lean individuals to bypass generalized height/weight assumptions.

Why We Display a ±10% Metabolic Confidence Band

Human metabolism is dynamic, not a fixed single number. Systematic reviews (Frankenfield et al., 2005) confirm that predictive equations are accurate within ±10% for approximately 80% of individuals. A calculated BMR of 1,699 kcal/day corresponds to a realistic physiological range of 1,529 to 1,869 kcal/day. Understanding this metabolic buffer prevents unnecessary dietary panic when scale progress fluctuates.

Frequently Asked Questions About the Mifflin–St Jeor Equation

What is the difference between Mifflin–St Jeor and Harris–Benedict?▼

Mifflin–St Jeor was published in 1990 from a cohort of 498 modern participants, whereas Harris–Benedict dates back to 1919. Because modern adult populations have different body compositions than 1919 cohorts, Mifflin–St Jeor typically produces a resting energy estimate that is 20–60 kcal lower than Harris–Benedict.

Is Mifflin–St Jeor a BMR or REE equation?▼

Scientifically, the Mifflin–St Jeor equation predicts Resting Energy Expenditure (REE), which is measured under resting conditions roughly 4–5 hours post-meal. Online, it is commonly referenced as a practical starting estimate for Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR).

How do I convert Mifflin–St Jeor REE to Total Daily Energy Expenditure (TDEE)?▼

To calculate TDEE, your resting REE is multiplied by a Physical Activity Level (PAL) multiplier between 1.2 (sedentary) and 1.9 (rigorous athletic training), or entered directly into our full TDEE Calculator.

Can I enter my weight in pounds and height in feet/inches?▼

Yes. You can switch between Imperial (lbs, ft/in) and Metric (kg, cm) at any time. Our engine automatically normalizes your entries internally to full mathematical precision.

Can this equation be used for teenagers and children?▼

The standard Mifflin–St Jeor study evaluated adults aged 19–78. In adolescents and children, active skeletal and tissue growth adds substantial caloric requirements that adult resting formulas do not reflect. Consult a qualified professional or guardian for youth nutrition tracking.

Why is my result different on other websites?▼

Variances across websites typically result from: (1) using a different underlying formula like 1919 Harris–Benedict or Schofield; (2) excessive rounding of constants; (3) rounding imperial conversions prematurely; or (4) applying hidden baseline activity factors without labeling them.

Peer-Reviewed References & Authoritative Literature

  1. Mifflin, M. D., St Jeor, S. T., Hill, L. A., Scott, B. J., Daugherty, S. A., & Koh, Y. O. (1990). A new predictive equation for resting energy expenditure in healthy individuals. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 51(2), 241–247. PMID: 2305711 • DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/51.2.241.
  2. Frankenfield, D., Roth-Yousey, L., & Compher, C. (2005). Comparison of predictive equations for resting metabolic rate in healthy nonobese and obese adults: a systematic review. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 105(5), 775–789. PMID: 15883556 • DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2005.02.005.
  3. Roza, A. M., & Shizgal, H. M. (1984). The Harris Benedict equation reevaluated: resting energy requirements and the body cell mass. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 40(1), 168–182. PMID: 6741850 • DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/40.1.168.
  4. Schofield, W. N. (1985). Predicting basal metabolic rate, new standards and review of previous work. Human Nutrition: Clinical Nutrition, 39 Suppl 1, 5–41. PMID: 4044297.
  5. FAO/WHO/UNU (2004). Human energy requirements. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation. FAO Food and Nutrition Technical Report Series 1. Rome: FAO.